Indiacon Civil

Subjects › Earthquake Engineering › Basics

Soft storey and other weak points

Basics Earthquake Engineering Reviewed 24 Oct 2026 2 min read

Earthquakes find the weakest link. Surveys after every major earthquake show the same patterns of collapse, and most come from features that could have been avoided at the planning stage. The best-known is the soft storey: an open ground floor, used for parking or shops, with walls above. The upper storeys, stiffened by their infill walls, move as a block, and almost all the sway concentrates in the bare columns of the open storey, which then fail.

A weak storey is related but different: a storey whose strength, rather than stiffness, is much lower than the one above. Other vertical irregularities include a sudden setback, a heavy mass such as a rooftop tank or swimming pool, and columns or walls that stop at one level and are carried on beams, called floating columns or discontinuous walls. Each one interrupts the smooth path of inertia forces down to the foundation.

Diagram: Indiacon original, not to scale.

Plan irregularities cause torsion. If stiff walls or cores sit on one side of a building, its centre of stiffness is far from its centre of mass, and the building twists as it sways, overloading the columns on the flexible side. Re-entrant corners in L, T or U shapes concentrate damage at the junction. Short columns, created by partial-height walls or mezzanine beams, attract very high shear because stiffness grows with the cube of the shortened length.

IS 1893 (Part 1) defines these irregularities and restricts or penalises them; some are not permitted in higher zones. The remedies are simple and cheap if adopted early: continuous walls or bracing from foundation to roof, symmetric layouts, separation joints between wings, and no floating columns.

Tip

Look at the building section first: any storey without walls under storeys with walls is a warning sign.

Key formulas
  • Fixed-fixed column lateral stiffness: k = 12 E I / h³
  • Storey stiffness = Σ k of all columns (plus walls) in the storey
  • Stiffness ratio for same columns: k₁ / k₂ = (h₂ / h₁)³
Common mistake

Treating infill walls as non-structural in the model while they stiffen the upper storeys in reality.

Solved example

Problem. A frame has a 4.5 m tall open ground storey and 3.0 m storeys above, with identical columns. Treating columns as fixed-ended and ignoring infill, compare the ground-storey stiffness with that of the storey above.

  1. Column stiffness varies as 1 / h³ for the same E I.
  2. Ratio = (3.0 / 4.5)³ = (0.667)³ = 0.296.
  3. The ground storey has only about 30 percent of the stiffness of the storey above, even before infill walls stiffen the upper storeys further.
  4. With infill above, the contrast grows, so sway concentrates in the ground storey: a soft storey.

Answer. Ground-storey stiffness about 0.30 of the storey above

Quick quiz

1What is a soft storey?

A storey much more flexible than the one above, often an open ground floor.

2Why do short columns fail in shear?

Shortening greatly increases stiffness (as 1/h³), so they attract large shear.

3Name one cure for torsional irregularity.

Arrange walls or bracing symmetrically, near the perimeter.

Code note
  • IS 1893 (Part 1) (India): Criteria for earthquake-resistant design: seismic zones and how to work out earthquake forces.
  • IS 13920 (India): Ductile design and detailing of reinforced concrete structures for seismic forces.
  • EN 1998 (Eurocode 8) (Europe): Design of structures for earthquake resistance.

Cited by number and clause only. We do not reproduce clause text, tables or figures (BIS Act 2016, s.10(5) and s.11). Check the current edition and amendments before use.

References and further reading

Standard texts, listed in no order of merit. We do not copy text, figures, tables or solved problems from any book; our explanations and examples are original.

  • A. K. Chopra, Dynamics of Structures, Pearson, latest edition.
  • T. Paulay, M. J. N. Priestley, Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings, Wiley, 1992.
  • P. Agarwal, M. Shrikhande, Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, PHI Learning, latest edition.

Free and official sources

All references for this subject →

Found an error? Write to indiacongroupofengineers [at] gmail [dot] com. For corrections and feedback. We never ask for payment or personal details.