Corbels and deep beams
Ordinary beam theory assumes plane sections remain plane and that span is large compared with depth. Corbels and deep beams break that assumption. A corbel is a short cantilever bracket projecting from a column or wall to support a beam or crane girder, with the load close to the face. A deep beam has a span comparable to its depth, such as a transfer girder, a pile cap or a wall acting as a beam. In both, load travels in a direct compression strut from the load to the support.
The strut-and-tie model is the natural tool. The concrete is idealised as inclined compression struts, the main reinforcement as horizontal ties, and the points where they meet as nodes. Equilibrium of the truss gives the tie force, the struts are checked for crushing and the nodes for bearing. For a corbel, the tie force is roughly the load times its distance from the column face divided by the lever arm, plus any horizontal force from shrinkage or restraint.
IS 456 treats corbels in clause 28 and deep beams in clause 29. For deep beams it gives the lever arm directly as a function of span and depth, because the linear strain assumption no longer holds. It defines a simply supported beam as deep when its effective span is less than twice its overall depth, and a continuous one when the ratio is below 2.5.
Detailing decides success. Corbel ties must be anchored at the outer face, often by welding to a cross bar or bending into a loop, because the load sits close to the end. Horizontal stirrups confine the strut. In deep beams, the main tension steel is spread over a band near the soffit, and a web mesh controls cracks. Bearing plates and edge distances must keep the node within the reinforced zone.
Sketch the strut-and-tie truss before choosing bars; it shows where anchorage is critical.
Corbel tie force (strut-and-tie, approximate): T = V a / z + HDeep beam lever arm, simply supported (IS 456): z = 0.2 (l + 2 D) for 1 ≤ l / D ≤ 2; z = 0.6 l for l / D < 1Tie steel: A_s = T / (0.87 f_y)
Designing a corbel as a slender cantilever with ordinary bending theory.
Problem. A corbel carries a factored vertical load of 400 kN at 200 mm from the column face. Take a lever arm of 400 mm and no horizontal force. Fe 500 steel. Find the tie force and tie steel. Separately, find the lever arm of a simply supported deep beam with l = 4 m and D = 2.5 m.
- Tie force T = 400 × 200 / 400 = 200 kN.
- A_s = 200 000 / (0.87 × 500) = 200 000 / 435 = 460 mm², for example 3 bars of 16 mm (603 mm²), since 4 bars of 12 mm (452 mm²) fall just short.
- Deep beam: l / D = 4 / 2.5 = 1.6, between 1 and 2.
- z = 0.2 (4 + 2 × 2.5) = 0.2 × 9 = 1.8 m.
Answer. Tie force 200 kN, about 460 mm² of steel; deep beam lever arm 1.8 m
Quick quiz
1How does load travel in a corbel?
By a direct compression strut from the load to the column, tied by top steel.
2When is a simply supported beam deep in IS 456?
When effective span is less than twice the overall depth.
3Why weld the corbel tie to a cross bar?
The load is close to the end, so the tie needs full anchorage at the outer face.
- IS 456 (India): Plain and reinforced concrete: general rules for materials, durability, design and construction.
- ACI 318 (USA): Building code requirements for structural concrete.
- EN 1992 (Eurocode 2) (Europe): Design of concrete structures.
Clauses and documents to read
- IS 456:2000, cl. 28: concrete corbels
- IS 456:2000, cl. 29: deep beams (definition, lever arm, reinforcement)
Cited by number and clause only. We do not reproduce clause text, tables or figures (BIS Act 2016, s.10(5) and s.11). Check the current edition and amendments before use.
References and further reading
Standard texts, listed in no order of merit. We do not copy text, figures, tables or solved problems from any book; our explanations and examples are original.
- S. Unnikrishna Pillai, Devdas Menon, Reinforced Concrete Design, McGraw Hill Education (India), latest edition.
- J. K. Wight, J. G. MacGregor, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design, Pearson, latest edition.
- A. H. Nilson, D. Darwin, C. W. Dolan, Design of Concrete Structures, McGraw Hill, latest edition.
- R. Park, T. Paulay, Reinforced Concrete Structures, Wiley, 1975.
Free and official sources
Found an error? Write to indiacongroupofengineers [at] gmail [dot] com. For corrections and feedback. We never ask for payment or personal details.